At some point, GA4 quietly switched everyone over to data-driven attribution as the default reporting model. Most people never chose that — and most people also don't know about the one requirement that determines whether it's even working the way it's supposed to.
By default, GA4 uses data-driven attribution for its reporting — a model that uses machine learning to distribute fractional conversion credit across every touchpoint that contributed, weighted by how much each one actually seemed to matter, based on your own account's conversion patterns rather than a fixed rule. It considers up to 20 touchpoints across channels in the 90 days before a conversion.
This matters a lot for smaller accounts. If your GA4 property is under that conversion threshold, the "data-driven" label in your reports may not mean what you think it means for at least some of your conversion events.
The most common mistake here is picking whichever model makes a favorite channel look best and reporting that one. The report is more useful read the other way: look at where a channel's credit changes the most between models. A channel whose credit drops sharply under last-click but stays high under data-driven is very likely playing an assist role — it shows up early and often, but rarely closes.
If Paid Social's share of conversions is 24% under data-driven but only 9% under last-click, that gap is the story — it's a channel doing real work earlier in journeys that a last-click-only view would make you underfund.
For the full comparison of what data-driven attribution is actually doing relative to simpler models, see marketing attribution models compared.
Conversion tracking and attribution consultant. Spends most days inside Google Tag Manager, GA4, and server-side tracking setups, helping ecommerce and B2B teams figure out where their customers actually came from. More about Abdul →